Career resources content posted on NEJM CareerCenter is produced by freelance health care writers as an advertising service of NEJM Group, a division of the Massachusetts Medical Society and should not be construed as coming from, or representing the views of, the New England Journal of Medicine, NEJM Group, or the Massachusetts Medical Society

By Benjamin Schwartz, MD, MBA

For clinicians, risk aversion is a feature, not a flaw. From early in our training, we are taught to be measured, thoughtful, and cautious in our decision-making. Universal protocol dictates that we pause before surgery to confirm patient identity, anatomical site, side, and procedure. Asking patients the same questions multiple times can be a redundant annoyance, but it’s also critical to ensuring safe, proper treatment. In orthopedics, we follow the mantra “measure twice, cut once” — you can always take more, but you can’t put it back.

Shared decision-making is the foundation of sound clinical medicine. Properly understanding and explaining the risks and benefits of an intervention protects us and our patients. But risk management at the bedside isn’t necessarily the same as professional risk management. Does the same bias toward risk avoidance that serves us well in our practices hinder us when making career decisions? How much career risk is too much career risk?

Choosing a job is one of the hardest and most important decisions we face as clinicians. To minimize the risk of picking the wrong opportunity, we make “pros” and “cons” lists, scrutinize job boards, and comb our networks. Yet, despite all our preparation, 40 to 50 percent of physicians change jobs in the first few years of their careers. Location, flexibility, autonomy, burnout, and a desire for better work-life balance all play a role. So too does risk tolerance.

In today’s health care climate, a position in a large, well-established organization with a guaranteed salary and predictable work schedule may seem like a safe bet. Rising educational debt and downward pressure on reimbursement make betting on the future of independent medical practice seem risky. Ironically, our tendencies toward risk aversion have contributed to record levels of physician employment. The abundance of caution that keeps us out of clinical trouble may have worsened the challenges faced by our profession.

At the same time, taking too much risk can be just as unwise professionally as it is clinically. Choosing a position primarily based on a generous salary or choice geographic location can lead to buyer’s remorse. Stepping outside of your comfort zone by practicing in an underserved area or starting your own solo practice can be incredibly rewarding. But it’s critical to assess the positives and negatives of each situation and understand your own level of risk tolerance.

These questions become even more complex when entertaining a career pivot. Clinicians are increasingly exploring opportunities beyond traditional bedside practice: administration, industry, consulting, health care startups, venture capital, or even a complete shift into a different field. Contemplating such a pivot can be anxiety-inducing given clinicians’ innate risk aversion. Leaving the frontlines can feel like a loss of both professional identity and personal security. Some clinicians debate a career pivot for years but never make the change; they simply never get comfortable with the risk involved.

Traditional clinical careers were relatively static. Physicians remained in the same practice for decades, becoming institutions unto themselves. Modern careers are more fluid. The idea that career paths must follow a straight line no longer holds; many clinicians will hold multiple roles across their professional lifetimes. Others will opt to pivot their careers entirely. The psychological weight of a career transition is heavy, especially for clinicians. It forces us to confront and accept risks that our medical training conditions us to avoid. Difficult questions follow.

Am I willing to trade a stable, well-defined role for one with ambiguity? How much uncertainty can my family and finances accommodate? How are success and failure defined in a different domain? Am I running toward something meaningful or simply running away from something uncomfortable? How much risk is too much risk?

I faced these questions myself when I recently pivoted from practicing orthopedic surgeon to physician executive (chief medical officer) at a Series B startup. The decision was not an easy one. It required deep understanding of the stakes involved, anticipation of known and unknown challenges, and preparation for the worst-case scenario. Before moving forward, I spent a lot of time weighing the various risks associated with a career change and developing an evaluation process.

There’s no set answer to the question: “How much career risk is too much career risk?” However, there are ways to evaluate and de-risk a professional pivot such that the decision is thoughtful rather than impulsive. Every individual’s circumstances are unique, professionally, personally, and financially. Evaluating and de-risking these three components, to the extent possible, is critical to making a successful career change.

Maintaining Optionality De-Risks Your Professional Path

Professionally, it’s important to plan carefully and thoughtfully while maintaining optionality. Experimenting with advisory roles, part-time commitments, or contract-based work smooths the transition and provides room to modify your approach. “Side gigs” build networks, surface additional opportunities, and may even evolve into more permanent roles. Advanced business degrees like an MBA or MHA are not a prerequisite for a successful career pivot, nor will they necessarily alter your trajectory. Instead, seek out leadership positions that leverage your expertise and demonstrate measurable impact. Gaining true operational experience is more valuable than accumulating titles or positions. Finally, keep your license active, stay engaged with continuing medical education, and maintain relationships with former colleagues. Doing so reduces risk by enabling a return to clinical practice, if necessary.

De-Risking Your Personal Identity and Family Dynamics

Personally, it’s important to consider the identity risk that comes with a career change. Many clinicians underestimate how tightly their sense of self is connected to patient care and “being in the arena.” Similarly, physician career transitions can create a feeling of guilt. For some, pivoting away from frontline clinical care feels like letting down patients or turning their back on the system. Family dynamics also play a critical role as career transitions impact households, particularly when income or schedules shift. De-risking the personal aspects of career change requires careful thought and detailed planning. Identity risk can be mitigated through self-reflection, career counseling, or mentoring. Clear and open communication with family members reduces the feeling of uncertainty that comes with a career change.

Building a Resilient Runway to De-Risk Your Finances

Financial clarity is essential during a career transition. Develop a realistic understanding of your financial runway and plan for contingencies. Is a lower income sustainable? If so, for how long? Are lifestyle and spending habit changes necessary (and tolerable)? What do worst-case scenarios look like? Depending on the situation, not every opportunity will match the compensation of clinical practice, at least initially. Startups offer asymmetric upside but come with less predictability and structure. However, not every opportunity should be viewed through a short-term income lens. Some roles offer long-term professional growth that compensates for early financial uncertainty. A clear financial plan provides psychological breathing room. Career transition risk feels tolerable when financial resiliency is pre-planned.

As clinicians, we tend to overestimate the risk of making a career change and underestimate the risk of following a “safe” career trajectory. All career decisions carry some risk, whether it’s deciding to stay, leave, pivot, or double down. Ultimately, our choices must align with our values, aspirations, and tolerance for uncertainty. By nature and by training, we value caution, stability, and predictability. Those traits are essential in clinical practice but can restrict professional growth. While clinicians are generally risk-averse, we’re often more adaptable than we realize.

So, “how much career risk is too much career risk?” Perhaps a better question is, “What opportunities am I missing by avoiding it?” A well-chosen, thoughtfully pursued risk can open doors to growth, leadership, and purpose that would otherwise remain closed. Avoiding risk, while keeping us comfortable, rarely moves us forward.